
Why not support the U.S. State Department to change the regime in Sudan?
Monday, January 9, 2012
Last week received the U.S. State Department - for the first time - on a number of selected questions from Twitter (Twitter) This is also the first news conference of the Ministry via the Internet, specifically via Twitter (Twitter). In this virtual press conference, Ms Victoria Nuland (Victoria Nuland) to answer a number of questions selected after the press release provided by the ministry each Friday.
One of the questions addressed by Noland was that of Sudan, has angered the answer is a active part of a cluster - Acting for the Sudan - (Act for Sudan), and was active and the "Etc" in the name (@ ObSilence) has raised the question in which he said - why not support the U.S. State Department regime change in Sudan? While the government continues ethnic cleansing, why Libya and Syria, not Sudan?
The answer to Victoria as follows: "First, each country's circumstances and every situation is different from the others, but I say that we have for several years pushed for a genuine democratic transition and the end of violence, pushed for reforms and exercised pressure to end the violence in South Kordofan and the Nile and the Blue, and for a comprehensive solution to the Darfur conflict. and bring those responsible for crimes against humanity to trial.
Noland went on saying that the normalization of relations will not be until after the violence and called on the Government to work with civilians to resolve differences. Noland acknowledged the humanitarian situation of human pettiness and Almmarasat unacceptable Kqcef civilians and the prevention of humanitarian aid.
For his part, the Alliance of action for Sudan issued a statement today saying that a large number of its members are not convinced to answer and that Noland has turned around the question a way that reduces the size of the crisis situation of human rights in Sudan. And before the statement from spokesman Eric Kohn (Eric Cohen), We understand that each country's circumstances, but it lacks the United States standards for their responsibilities towards the ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
He Cohn said in Libya when he was thousands of civilians in danger is President Obama's military strike is limited to protect them and called Libyan dictator to step down in public, why Atcod United States international community to protect millions of Sudanese are threatened by their government, using all means including military. Why shoot down Sudanese President Antalib and wanted him with crimes against humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment